The title of the above seems very contradictory to one proverb which reads: "Little by little, so long hill ', tul guns? But do not need to be asked again the same writers, as indeed the title once with a saying such contradictory. Nevertheless the author does not intend to memelesetkan these sayings, let alone make it as crisp a funny joke material never comes up, Mandra, Tesi, Tarzan, omas, de .. el .. el .. especially now existing Luna Maya. He .. he .. ye ... crunchy? (Do not need to be questioned again, it has crisp!)
Maxim that writers are often our pelesetkan maknai as a reflection of how the importance of saving for our better life in the future.Tetapi really not just saying that talking about saving lives or saving perseverance. It may reflect the adage about something more valuable than just a bag of coins, ie good deeds. When we are able to collect the goods from our small actions, we will feel the greatness of our soul. A big thank you a smile, friendly greeting, or a friendly hug (WARNING: It is prohibited if done by men and women who are not strange ....!!!), are actions that may be trivial. But if done with compassion, he will be far more valuable than saving our hill.
And remember the word of Allah in the 7th paragraph of surah Al-Zalzalah:
Whoever is doing good as heavy dzarrahpun, undoubtedly he will see (reply) it. (Surat Al-Zalzalah: 7)
So ... we're the only charity that made his affection given to us, so the LORD meridokan His heaven for us to inhabit.
This also applies to actions that will make us slumped, as oversimplifying the problem doctrinal camps, worship, mumalah, politics, behavior, etc.. For example in the case doctrinal camps, most of us too see that learning about it enough to memorize aqidah pillars of faith, so that we are lazy to study it more deeply. And when there is an example of distorted Ahmadiyya group, JIL, etc., people who do not know where the location because they do not want memepalajarinya kesesatannnya even be surprised by the groups who oppose them. So do not be surprised if someone from some of them who say, "How come they still resisted, even bullied, you are both Muslims, too!", Even some who defend and melindunginnya.
This is very dangerous and harmful aqidah Muslims. How not, a misguided group and if we justify it, then we will include them into the group also is not it? It happens to most of our society because too oversimplifying in studying the Islamic doctrinal camps.
In poliltik problem, we already know that the system used by us today is that human-made systems that can not be terlebas from the relative nature and opportunists who made it, but still only used by our government, on the grounds that it was all there was no dispute with Islamic law, there are many scholars who say that (hopefully they are in a state of forgetting). Whereas a result of the implementation of this system has ditampakan thagut clearly by God. But basic human ...
At first we consider a man-made systems that there is no dispute with the Islamic shariah, then try, then used, studied and disseminated, and then assume that the system was considered the price of death for this nation to the exclusion of God-made system that should more appropriately be used by humans. Not even a little of the intellectuals who claim Islam considers that the Islamic system is no longer feasible to use and very threatening national sovereignty. No sombongkah if man considers his God-made systems deemed unfit to take care of matters himself. Naudzubillah.
In muamalah problem, because this country at the beginning of the Islamic system is based on not by a valid, fair system that made Allah the Most Just. Considered halal haram not matter anymore, which subhat so unusual is not a problem anymore, as long as it does not bertentngan with the laws and get permission from the government, that's not a problem. Is this a minor problem?
In human behavioral acts are considered to be contrary to the religious culture, freesex, free sex, how to dress as long as it does not interfere with the public interest and for consensual it was permissible, even in the case of prostitution, provided by the government dilokalalisasi this into a legal act (diiklanin again, for example by advertising ditayangkannya [sorry] condom and suggested that people who do wear fornication avoid pregnancy and contracting sexually transmitted diseases). Is this trivial?
Yes ... so to speak. Bit by bit long gone, when we too made light of faith and perbutan leads the problem. Eventually we are going to become commonplace, after the usual we'll forget that bolting is highly unpopular act by which we create. And we did not realize that our faith had been eroded by it. Coupled with our indifference to the problem of religion. So woe that will befall us, we regret that no natural berujungpun future, before God who created us.
And all who do evil for dzarrahpun, undoubtedly he will see (reward) him too. (Surat Al-Zalzalah: 8)
For that we must not underestimate the act is too small in our eyes, because his presence would help us from the anger. And do not assume things about the vices and kemungkaran trivial because later on it could instead plunges us into the abyss disgrace.
When the wise man can say 'sekikit by little so long hill', no wise person can say, 'little by little exhausted after a long time'.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar